The communal award was given by British PM Ramsey McDonald. Under this the Christians, Muslims, Sikhs and even depressed classes would get separate electorates. Although the congress was against separate electorates as they divided the community it decided to remain neutral on the question of separate electorates for Christians, Sikh, and Muslims.
But all nationalists were completely opposed to separate electorates for depressed classes. The award was seen by Gandhiji as against Indian unity and nationalism. It would be harmful to both Hinduism and depressed classes and would halt the work of Hindu social reform. Gandhiji was for giving them reservations in seats.
He went on a fast for this question. Finally BR Ambedkar and other leaders worked on a solution were separate electorates were abandoned and reservations were given instead.
Once the civil disobedience movement was withdrawn a new question emerged as to the activity during the future course. Gandhiji advocated constructive activity whereas other line of thought wanted revival of constitutional method of struggle and participation. The argument was that constitutional participation would extend the influence of the congress and prepare it for the next phase of the struggle. However it shall not amount to having faith in the constitutional politics. A new line of thought emerged due to the strong left trend in the country. The leftists wanted another mass struggle instead of constitutional work and constructive programs.
Nehru represented their thoughts. He believed that the withdrawal of the civil disobedience and return to constructive programs has become like a retreat. His alienation with Gandhiji too was highest at this point. He wanted to focus on class struggle of workers and peasants. He believed in organizing them into unions and affiliating these into the congress would integrate them with the freedom struggle. He also was opposed to gandhian plan of Struggle -Truce-Struggle and wanted Struggle-Victory i.e. fights till victory was won.
This strong conflict between Nehru and leftists on one side and proponents of council entry on the other that a split was foreseen. Gandhiji emerged as the peace maker here and decided to allow the congressmen to fight elections. He laid a condition that they would not get sucked into constitutionalism or become self serving. He told the leftists that withdrawal of the movement didn’t come due to pressure from the bourgeois but reality of the political situation. He further appeased the left wing by supporting Nehru as president of congress.
In the legislative assembly elections the congress won a majority thus a victory for Gandhiji.
The British knew that the civil disobedience was crushed but this situation couldn’t be kept for a long time. So with a view to integrate the congress with administrative structures and to internally divide it. Another phase of constitutional reforms was planned.
The British parliament approved the government of India act, 1935. Under this an all India federation would be created of provinces and princely states. The representatives of princely states would come from nomination by the princes and direct elections from the provinces. However franchise was limited and defense and foreign affairs were kept outside of it. The Viceroy and the governors were given special executive powers.
The colonial strategy was to back the constitutionalists and moderates of the congress by lure of constitutional powers. The British hoped that this would dissuade them from the politics of sacrifice. On the other hand the repressive measures against those who opted for extra legal means would further discourage the protestors. This would then lead to a split in the congress.
The part of this complex strategy was measures to promote division between left and right wings. And also constitutionalists and gandhians. The government wanted to lure the rightwing and the constitutionalists with the promise of reforms. The British hoped that the leftist would see this as a betrayal and would split from the congress or be removed.
Provincial autonomy was a part of this strategy. It would create big provincial leaders that would undermine the all India leadership of the congress.
The act however was unanimously rejected by all leaders of the congress.
British however immediately put into practice the provincial features of the act and declared elections to the provincial legislative assembly. The matter of elections again created a split in the opinion. There was full agreement that the congress should fight the elections. But whether or not to form a government was the question. Here the leftwing led by Nehru, Bose, congress socialists and communists were totally opposed. Office acceptance would mean that congress would become part of the repressive apparatus. They wanted the swarajist alternative i.e. to join government to obstruct it at every step.
On the right wing Rajendra Prasad explained that none believed that constitutional work would get freedom or was anyone going to be lured by the power of the office but it was necessary in the interest of people. They believed that administrative offices shouldn’t be left to pro-government parties. They wanted provincial ministries to be used for constructive work.
Gandhiji though against office acceptance believed that another mass movement couldn’t be launched due to the short span of time available. So he decided that a chance could be given to the congress. Also the mood in the congress was for this.
Congress won a massive mandate in the elections.
“We are provided with a car, all brakes and no engine – Jawaharlal Nehru’s opinion of the Government of India Act, 1935.
Nationalists’ Response to The 1935 Act
Q1:Communal Award was given by
Q2:Communal award gave separate electorates to
3.both a and b
Q3:Post civil disobedience movement saw
1.advocacy of constructive activity by Gandhiji
2.advocacy of council entry by congressmen
3.focus on class struggle of peasants and workers by Nehru
Q4:Provincial autonomy was provided in Govt of India Act, 1935 for
1.create big provincial leaders that would undermine the all India leadership of the congress.
2.have powerful states
3.consider linguistic demands
4.consider communal demands
Q5:There was unanimity between left and right wing of congress on matters of
1.fighting provincial elections
3.freedom through constitutional means