The population of a State is divided into two cJasses – citizens and aliens. While citizens enjoy full civil and political Citizenship rights, aliens do not enjoy all of them. Citizens are members of the political community to which they belong. They are the people who compose the State.
The question of citizenship became particularly important at the time of the making of our Constitution because the Constitution sought to confer certain rights and privileges upon those who were entitled to Indian Citizenship while they were to be denied to ‘aliens’. The latter were even placed under certain disabilities.
Thus, citizens of India have the following rights under the Constitution which aliens shall not have:
Some of the Fundamental Rights belong to citizens alone, such as.-Arts. 15, 16, 19.
Only citizens are eligible for certain offices such as those of the President, Vice-President, Judge of the Supreme Court or of a High Court; Attorney-General; Governor of a State ; Advocate-General [Art. 165].
The right of suffrage for election to the House of the People (of the Union) and the Legislative Assembly of every State [Art. 326] and the right to become a member of Parliament and of the Legislature of a State are also confined to citizens.
All the above rights are denied to aliens whether they are ‘friendly’ or ‘enemy aliens’. But ‘enemy aliens’ suffer from a special disability; they are not entitled to the benefit of the procedural provisions in Art. 22 relating to arrest and detention. An alien enemy includes not only subjects of a State at war with India but also Indian citizens who voluntarily reside in or trade with such a State.
The Constitution, however, did not intend to lay down a permanent or comprehensive law relating to citizenship in India. It Simply described the classes of persons who would be deemed to be the statutory basis of citizens of India at the date of the commencement of the Citizenship in Constitution and left the entire law of citizenship to be India regulated by some future law made by Parliament.
Parliament has enacted the Citizenship Act making elaborate provisions for the acquisition and termination of citizenship subsequent to the commencement of the Constitution the provisions of this Act are to be read with the provisions of Part II of the Constitution, in order to get a complete picture of the law of Indian citizenship.
In view of the fact that the Act of Parliament only deals with the modes of acquisition of citizenship subsequen: to the commencement of the Constitution, It would be convenient to deal with them separately.
A person born as well as domiciled in the ‘territory of India’-irrespective of the nationality of his parents
A person domiciled in the ‘territory of India’, either of whose parents was born in the territory of India,-lrrespective of the nationality of his parents or the place of birth of such person
A person who or whose father or mother was not born in India, but who (a) had his domicile- in the ‘territory of India” and (b) had been ordinarily residing within the territory of India for not less than 5 years immediately preceding the commencement of the Constitution. In this case also, the nationality of the person’s parents is immaterial. Thus, a subject of a Portuguese Settlement, residing in India for not less than 5 years imnmediately preceding the commencement of the Constitution, with the intention of permanently residing in India, would become a citizen of India at the commencement of the Constitution
A person who had migrated from Pakistan, provided
He or either of his parents or grand-parents was born in ‘India as defined in the Government of India Act, 1935
if he had migrated before July 19, 1948 – he has ordinarily resided within the “territory of India” since the date of such migration (in his case no registration of the immigrant is necessary for citizenship); or
if he had migrated on or after July 19, 1948, he further makes an applicaion before the commencement of this Constitution for registering himself as a citizen of India to an officer appointed by the Government of India, and is registered by that officer, being satisfied that the applicant has resided in the territory of India for at least 6 months before such application.
A person who migrated from India to Pakistan after the 1st March, 1947, but had subsequently returned to India under a permit issued under the authority of the Government of India for resettlement or permanent return or under the authority of any Law provided he gets himself registered in the same manner
A person who, or any of whose parents or grand-parents was born in ‘India’ as defined in the Government of India Act, 1935 (as Originally enacted) but who is ordinarily residing in any country outside India (whether befor« or after the commencement of this Constitution), on application in the prescribed form, to the consular or diplomatic representative of India in the country of his residence [Art. 8]. (Provision was thus made for Indians living In foreign countries at the date of commencement of the Constitution.
So far as employments under the Union are concerned, there shall be no qualification for residence within any particular territory, but by Article 16(3) of the Constitution, Parliament is empowered to lay down that as regards any particular class or classes of employment under a State or a Union Territory residence within that State or Territory shall be a necessary qualiflcation.
This exception in the case of State employments has been engrafted for the sake of efficiency, insofar as it depends on familiarity with local conditions.
It is to be noted that it is Parliament which would be the sole authority to legislate in this matter and that State Legislatures shall have no voice. To this extent, invidious discrimination in different States is sought to be avoided.
Parliament, in the exercise of this power, enacted the Public Employment (Requirement as to Residence) Act, 1957, for a temporary duration. By this Act, Parliament empowered the Central Government to make rules, having force for a specified period, prescribing a residential requirement only for appointment to non-Gazetted posts in Andhra Pradesh, Himachal Pradesh, Manipur and Tripura,
Since the expiry of this Act in 1974, nobody can be denied employment in any State on the ground of his being a non-resident In that State.’
As will be seen in the Chapter on Fundamental Rights, Art. 15(1), which prohibits discrimination on grounds only of race, religion, caste, sex or place of birth, does not mention residence.
It is, therefore, constitutionally permissible for a State to confer special benefits upon its residents in matters other than those in respect of which rights are conferred by the Constitution upon all citizens of India.
One of these, for instance, is the matter of levying fees for admission to State educational institutions. The Supreme Court has held that because discrimination on the ground of residence is not prohibited by Article 15, it is permissible for a State to offer a concession to its residents in the matter of fees for admission to its State Medical eollege.
So far as the State of Jammu and Kashmir is concerned, the Legislature of the State is authorised” to confer special rights and privileges upon persons permanently resident in the State as respects-
employment under the State Government.
acquisition of immovable property in the State;
settlement in the State;
right to scholarships and such other forms of aid as the State Government may provide.
Q1:Aliens do not enjoy right of
1.Right against discrimination on any grounds
2.equality of opportunity in public service
3.right to vote
Q2: In India office of president is available to citizen by
Q3:Ways of acquiring Indian citizenship are:
3.acquisition of territory by India
Q4:Loss of citizenship can be by
Q5:Which is true
1.No dual citizenship is allowed in India
2.USA has dual citizenship
3.NRI/PIO dont enjoy political rights